Anatomical and Histological Study of theVomeronasal Organ In (Ctenodactylus gundi)
Abstract
Ctenodctylus gundi is one of the economically important rodents in many of the North African countries; it is a social animal living in groups of 20 or more members, dominated by one or two males. Literature is very poor concerning studies dealing with this animal in general, especially those concerning anatomy, histology and methods of intraspecific and conspecific communication of this species. In addition to the main olfactory system which is composed of nostrils, nasal cavities and olfactory bulb, these small mammals have an accessory chemosensory system referred to as the Vomeronasal (VN) system
This study is intended to shed some light on histological and anatomical representation of the Vomeronasal organ (Jacobson’s organ) of this species, as a continuation to previous studies of scent glands and chemical communication between members of the same species and other species in their natural habitat.
Anatomically, the VN organ of gundi represents a chemosensory system; it is anatomically and functionally distinct from the main olfactory system; it is composed of a pair of bilaterally symmetrical epithelial crescent-shaped structures, embedded in an incomplete cartilaginous capsule on each side of the nasal septum.
Histologically; the VNO organ crescent-shaped lumen is lined by two different epithelia; (1) sensory epithelium which appears as a somewhat thick layer consisting of three cell types; receptor, supportive and basal, (2) an olfactory epithelium that covers the bulk of the VNO organ consists of a layer of regular olfactory ciliated epithelial cells.
Full text article
References
Bhatnagar, K. P.; and Smith, T. D. (2007). Light microscope and ultrastructural observations on vomeronasal organ of Anoura (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)., Anatomical Record; 290(11), 1341-13-54.
Cooper, J. G.; and Bhatnagar, K. P. (1976).Comparative anatomy of the vomeronasal organ complex in bats. Journal of anatomy 122: 571-601
Jacobson, L.; Trotier,D.; Doving, K.B. (1998). Anatomical description of a new organin the nose of domestic animals by Ludvig Jacobson (1813).Chemical senses,(23):743-754.
Keller, M.; Baum, M. J.; Brock, O.; Brennan, P.A.; Bakker, J.(2009).The mainand accessory olfactory systems interaction in the control of mate recognition and sexual behavior. Behavioral brain research; 200 (2), 268-276.
Kratzing, J. (1984). The structural distribution of nasal glands in four marsupial species. Journal of Anatomy, (139): 553-564.
Mshiri, O. A. and Berim, N. S. (2018).Emptying mechanism of perianal glands of Gundi (Ctenodactylus gundi).Journal of Biochemistry and cell biology. 1:1; pp. 1-4 .
Mshiri, O. A. and Berim, N. S. (2013).Scent glands of Gundi (Ctenodactylusgundi).3ed International Cinferance on Ecological, Environmental and Biological Sciences (ICEEBS’201 pp. 248.
Mucignat-Caretta, C. (2010).The rodent accessory olfactory system. Journal of comparative physiology, (A)196: 767-777.
Othman, M. A. (2011).Postnatal development of the female rabbit vomerosensoryepithelium. The Egyptian Journal of Histology, 34(1): 69-79.
Salazar, I.; and Sanchez-Quinteiro, P. (2011). A detailed morphological study of the vomeronasal organ and the accessory olfactory bulb of cats. Microscopy Research Technique, 74(12): 1109-1120.
Smith, T. D.; Siegel, M. I.; Mooney, M. P.; Burrows, A. M.; Todhunter, J. S.(1997).
Prenatal growth of human vomernasal organ. Anatomical record; 248 (3): 447-455.
Taniguchi, K.; and Mochizuki, K.(1982). Morphological studieson the vomeronasal organ in the golden hamster. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science.44: 419- 426.
Vacarezza, O. L.; Sepich, L. N.; Traimezzani, J. H. (1981). The vomernasal organ of the rat. Journal of Anatomy. 132(2): 167- 185.
Wekesa, S. K. (2012).Signaling in the mammalian vomeronasal organ. Journal of Biochemistry and physiology.1(3): 2-4.
Zingeser, M. R. (1984). The nasopalatine ducts and associated structures in rhesus monkey Macacamulatta: topography, prenatal development, function and phylogeny. Am. J. Anat. 170: 581-595. 176.