The absolute socioeconomic inequity attributable to smoking
Article Sidebar
-
smoking, absolute inequity, control
Abstract
Background.Smoking has several consequences over the society and the economy at same time. Because of smoking smokers are reducing the life quality and life expectation too. That is the main cause of absolute socioeconomic inequity attributable to smoking.
Objective.To characterize the absolute socioeconomic inequity attributable to smoking.
Matherials and methods. Were used several theorical methods as the inductive – deductive and the comparative too. As empirical method was used the bibliographic research.
Results.Smoking is the main cause of the existence of this particular inequity form. That’s why to eliminate the absolute socioeconomic inequity attributable to smoking is necessary focus the attention in the reduction of the tobacco consumption intensity as main explicative variable for personal smoker demand of health services because of smoking.
Conclusions. The absolute socioeconomic inequity attributable to smoking is showed by mortality and morbidity too. In both case the strategic to reduce the tobacco consumption must focus the attention as main way to control, reduce and eliminate the absolute socioeconomic inequity attributable to smoking
Full text article
References
2) Fernández Hernández F., Sánchez González E. The Socioeconomic Inequity Attributable to Smoking. Journal of Medical Practice and Review. 2019; 3(6):559-562.
3) Sánchez E, Fernández F. Costo social por pérdida absoluta de productividad laboral. RevistaCubana de Salud y Trabajo 2018;19(1):33-9.
4) FernándezHernández F., Sánchez González E. The Social and Economic Inequity from Smoking in Cuba. Annals of Medical & Surgical Case Reports. 2020; 2(2). AMSCR-100037.
5) Sánchez González E., Fernández Hernández F. La pérdida de productividad laboral atribuible al tabaquismo. Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo. 2016;17(2):57-60
6) Sánchez González E., Fernández Hernández F. Costo de oportunidad por muerte prematura de fumadores activos cubanos en el año 2011. Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo. 2017;18(2):26-31.
7) Sánchez González E, Fernández Hernández F. El rol de las autoridades fiscales en el control del tabaquismo. Rev. Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río. Mayo-junio, 2017; vol 21(3)362-367.
8) Fernández Hernández F, Sánchez González E. Carga epidemiológica vs carga económica del tabaquismo por morbilidad. Rev. Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río. Marzo -abril, 2017; vol. 21(2)210-216.
9) Fernández Hernández F, Sánchez González E. Algorithm to calculate the smoking economical burden in active and passive smokers. MedCrave Journal of Toxicology. 2018;4(6):373-375.
10) Sanchez Gonzalez E, Fernandez Hernandez F. The smoking fiscal space in Cuba. J Clin Med Res. 2019;1(3):1-5.
11) Arredondo A, Recaman AL, Pinzon C, Azar A. Financial consequences from smoking‐related diseases in middle‐income countries: Evidence and lessons from Mexico. Int J Health Plann Mgmt. 2018;33:e454–e463. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2487
12) Fernández Hernández F and Sánchez González E (2019) Economic8. Inequity Attributable to Smoking Ratio’s for the Public Health. HealthEconOutcome Res Open Access 5: 1-4.
13) Abascal Winston, Lorenzo Ana. Impacto de la política de control de tabaco en población adolescente en Uruguay. Salud pública Méx [revista en la Internet]. 2017 [citado 2019 Ago 08] ; 59( Suppl 1 ): 40-44. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342017000700040&lng=es. http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/8051